Leśniewski, Stanisław

or Stanisław Leshniewski

born March 30, 1886, Serpukhov, Russia
died May 13, 1939, Warsaw

Polish logician and mathematician.

As a professor at the University of Warsaw (1919–39), he became a cofounder and leading representative of the Warsaw school of logic. His distinctive contribution was the construction of three interrelated formal systems, to which he gave the Greek-derived names of protothetic, ontology, and mereology.

* * *

▪ Polish logician and mathematician
born March 30, 1886, Serpukhov, Russia
died May 13, 1939, Warsaw

      Polish logician (logic, history of) and mathematician who was a co-founder and leading representative of the Warsaw school of logic.

      Leśniewski was the son of one of the civil engineers chiefly responsible for the construction and supervision of the trans-Siberian railroad. After preliminary schooling in Russia and the Gymnasium in Siberia, he attended—as was the custom of the time—several universities in continental Europe, finally taking his doctoral degree in 1912 at the Polish University of Lwów (now Lviv, Ukraine), then a part of Austria. His dissertation was approved by Kazimierz Twardowski, who, for his wide-ranging influence on Polish intellectual life, is known as the father of contemporary Polish philosophy. Twardowski, like Edmund Husserl (Husserl, Edmund) (the founder of Phenomenology), was a student in Vienna of Franz Brentano, an Aristotelian and Scholastic philosopher who, although not himself interested in formal logic, was noted for his precise and thorough analysis of philosophical problems. Under his influence, Leśniewski's first scholarly interests focussed upon problems of philosophical logic, such as those that had concerned John Stuart Mill in 19th-century England and Husserl and others of the Austrian school. Thus, his doctoral dissertation of 1911 dealt with the analysis of existential propositions.

      The intellectual activity of Leśniewski divides into three distinct periods. The first extends from his dissertation to the appearance in 1916 of his first work on the theory of collective sets. Leśniewski attributed the discovery of his true intellectual vocation to the influence of Jan Łukasiewicz, also a pupil of Twardowski and then a privat dozent at the University of Lwów. Already learned in the history of logic, to which he was to make outstanding contributions, Łukasiewicz was at the time studying the work of the German logicians Gottlob Frege and Ernst Schröder, the importance of which he was mainly responsible for making known in Poland, and teaching his first course in mathematical logic. It was Łukasiewicz' book O Zasadzie Sprzeczności u Arystotelesa (1910; “On the Principle of Contradiction in Aristotle”) that awakened Leśniewski from his dogmatic slumber. From it he became interested in the problem posed by the discovery of the antinomies (antinomy), or paradoxes, in logic and mathematics that threatened to undermine the foundations of all deductive science. His efforts to overcome and solve these antinomies, with which Frege and Bertrand Russell (Russell, Bertrand) were also wrestling, eventually led to the great discoveries for which he is known.

      Although Leśniewski then definitely turned his back on philosophy in favour of logic—he later spoke of himself as a renegade from philosophy—his initial impression of mathematical logic (formal logic) was not at all favourable. He distrusted its technical formal notation, the scant attention given to its relation to ordinary language, and the resulting equivocations in the use of such terms as class, implies, and true. In attempting to clear away the equivocations in the work of Russell, however, he soon became convinced that the formal and artificial language of mathematical logic was essential for his work, that ordinary language was too clumsy and imprecise. The writings of this period were completed, however, before he had adopted the rigorous methods of mathematical logic and were all later repudiated by him.

      The period from 1916 to 1927 was one of intensive and creative research in which he accumulated a mass of results but refrained from publishing them. In 1915, upon the reopening of the University of Warsaw, Łukasiewicz had been called from Lwów to become professor of philosophy. Leśniewski, after teaching for two years at a Warsaw Gymnasium and spending the war years in Moscow, followed his friend and colleague to Warsaw in 1919 as professor of the philosophy of mathematics. They soon established a thriving centre of research that attracted talented students from all sides.

      Leśniewski finally felt constrained to start publishing some account of his findings, even though they were not yet in as perfect a form as he would have desired. Beginning with the publication, in 1927, of his first mature work on the foundations of mathematics and extending until his death, in 1939, he published a series of papers expounding the main lines of his theories of logic and mathematics. These publications gained a worldwide reputation for the Warsaw school. Yet, just as it was reaching its height, Leśniewski died suddenly and unexpectedly on the eve of the war that shortly engulfed the school in the common fate of Poland.

      Many of Leśniewski's findings remained unpublished at his death. Although all of his manuscripts were destroyed by the war, many of the unpublished results of his researches have since been made known through the work of his students, particulary that of Bolesław Sobociński and Alfred Tarski.

Major work in logic
      The distinctive and original contribution of Leśniewski consists in the construction of three interrelated logical systems, to which he gave the names, derived from the Greek, of protothetic, ontology, and mereology (q.v.). The logical basis of the whole theory, and hence its name (prōtos, “first”), is provided by protothetic, which is the most comprehensive theory yet developed of the relations between propositions. The other two systems are based on a distinction the lack of which, Leśniewski claimed, was the source of Russell's difficulties with the antinomies: that between a distributive and a collective class. In its distributive use, a class expression is identical with a general name; (name) thus, to say that a person belongs to the class of Poles is to say that that person is a Pole. Hence, ontology (on, “being”) is the logic of names; and, combined with protothetic, it yields all of the theorems of syllogistic (traditional Aristotelian logic) and of logical algebra, as well as of the logic of sets and relations. Mereology (meros, “part”) is the logic of a whole conceived as though physically constituted by its parts—i.e., of the collective class, as the class of all automobiles in Chicago consists of the entire collection of them. Hence, mereology is a general theory of the relation between part and whole.

      In developing these theories, Leśniewski gave great care to the statement of their metalogic and, for this purpose, elaborated a general theory of semantic categories, which is analogous, on the one hand, to the traditional doctrine of the parts of speech and, on the other, to Husserl's “meaning categories.”

      Leśniewski developed his logical systems with a clarity and precision that established a new standard for mathematical rigour. In their powers of implication, they are strong enough to provide a logical foundation for all of classical mathematics. They also overcome the antinomies in a way that Leśniewski claimed is better and truer than any other solution. In his opinion, modern mathematicians and logicians are often too neglectful, if not contemptuous, of humanity's naive and basic intuitions of the way things are. For this very reason, Alfred Tarski (Tarski, Alfred), one of his students who later went to the United States, described his position as “an intuitive formalism.” Leśniewski was openly critical of a pure formalism that would consider logic and mathematics as nothing more than a game of symbols. It is true that he advocated and employed formalist methods for their rigour and precision, but he maintained that a theory ultimately must be judged for its accord with reality. Nevertheless, Leśniewski maintained that his logical systems are neutral in that they make no metaphysical assumptions and are equally well adapted to diverse and even conflicting philosophical interpretations.

Otto Allen Bird

Additional Reading
Z.A. Jordan, Philosophy and Ideology: The Development of Philosophy and Marxism-Leninism in Poland Since the Second World War (1963), a comprehensive background history of the Warsaw school, includes much information about Leśniewski and his associates and a full bibliography. Tadeusz Kotarbiński, Gnosiology: The Scientific Approach to the Theory of Knowledge (1966), a Polish classic, for more than two decades provided the only elementary account of Leśniewski's work and influence and is still of value. Eugene C. Luschei, The Logical Systems of Lesniewski (1962), a book-length study of Leśniewski and his work, contains a comprehensive analytic bibliography of sources to 1962.

* * *

Universalium. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Lesniewski, Stanislaw — o Stanislaw Leshniewski (30 mar. 1886, Serpukhov, Rusia–13 may. 1939, Varsovia). Lógico y matemático polaco. Como profesor en la Universidad de Varsovia (1919–39), fue cofundador y principal representante de la escuela lógica de Varsovia. Su… …   Enciclopedia Universal

  • Stanislaw Lesniewski — Stanisław Leśniewski Stanisław Leśniewski Stanisław Leśniewski (30 mars 1886–13 mai 1939) est un mathématicien, philosophe et logicien polonais qui a contribué à créer et développer l École de Lvov Vars …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Stanisław Leśniewski — (30 mars 1886–13 mai 1939) est un mathématicien, philosophe et logicien polonais qui a contribué à créer et développer l École de Lvov Varsovie. Leśniewski est l une des plus remar …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Stanislaw Lesniewski — Stanisław Leśniewski (ca. 1910) Stanisław Leśniewski [sta ɲiswaf lɛ ɕɲɛfski] (* 30. März 1886 in Serpuchow; † 13. Mai 1939 in Warschau) war ein polnischer Philosoph, Mathematiker und …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Leśniewski — Stanisław Leśniewski (ca. 1910) Stanisław Leśniewski [sta ɲiswaf lɛ ɕɲɛfski] (* 30. März 1886 in Serpuchow; † 13. Mai 1939 in Warschau) war ein polnischer Philosoph, Mathematiker und …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Stanisław Leśniewski — (March 30 1886 – May 13 1939) was a Polish mathematician, philosopher and logician.LifeLeśniewski belonged to the first generation of the Lwów Warsaw School of logic founded by Kazimierz Twardowski. Together with Alfred Tarski and Jan Łukasiewicz …   Wikipedia

  • Stanislaw — (as used in expressions) Lesniewski Stanislaw Stanislaw Leshniewski Mikolajczyk Stanislaw Reymont Wladyslaw Stanislaw Wladyslaw Stanislaw Rejment Stanislaw I Stanislaw Leszczynski Stanislaw II August Poniatowski Stanislaw Poniatowski Ulam… …   Universalium

  • Stanislaw — (as used in expressions) Stanislaw Leszczynski Stanislaw Poniatowski Lesniewski, Stanislaw Stanislaw Leshniewski Mikolajczyk, Stanislaw Reymont, Wladyslaw (Stanislaw) Wladyslaw Stanislaw Rejment Antoni Stanislaw Boleslawawicz Stokowski Ulam,… …   Enciclopedia Universal

  • Stanisław Leśniewski — (ca. 1910) Stanisław Leśniewski [sta ɲiswaf lɛ ɕɲɛfski] (* 30. März 1886 in Serpuchow; † 13. Mai 1939 in Warschau) war ein polnischer Philosoph …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Stanisław — ist ein männlicher Vorname. Es ist die obersorbische (IPA: stanʲisu̯au̯) und polnische (IPA: sta nʲiswav). Form eines verbreiteten slawischen Vornamens. Die eingedeutschten Versionen lauten Stanislaw und Stanislaus. Die weibliche Form des Namens… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.